Benchmarks
Tools for testing compliance
Organizations that comply with the HAP 2007 Standard in Humanitarian Accountability and Quality Management can demonstrate that they meet six performance benchmarks.
Benchmark 1: Humanitarian quality management
The agency shall establish a humanitarian quality management system. A humanitarian quality management system is a designated set of processes that enable continual improvement in an agency’s performance in meeting the essential needs, and respecting the dignity, of disaster survivors.
Benchmark 2: Transparency
The agency shall make the following information publicly available to intended beneficiaries, disaster-affected communities, agency staff and other specified stakeholders: (a) organisational background; (b) humanitarian accountability framework; (c) humanitarian plan; (d) progress reports; and (e) complaints handling procedures.
Benchmark 3: Beneficiary participation
The agency shall enable beneficiaries and their representatives to participate in program decisions and seek their informed consent.
Benchmark 4: Staff competencies
The agency shall determine the competencies, attitudes and development needs of staff required to implement its humanitarian quality management system.
Benchmark 5: Complaints handling
The agency shall establish and implement complaints-handling procedures that are effective, accessible and safe for intended beneficiaries, disaster-affected communities, agency staff, humanitarian partners and other specified bodies.
Benchmark 6: Continual improvement
The agency shall establish a process of continual improvement for its humanitarian accountability framework and humanitarian quality management system
Self-Assessment
Review your agency's level of humanitarian accountability by conducting this self-assessment against the 6 benchmarks
Download the self assessment
Accountability champions - Aceh 2005
"It is not only what we do, but also what we do not do, for which we are accountable."
Molière, French playright, (1622 - 1673)